Saturday

Hipstamatic’s new Tintype lens/film test


With the release of Hipstamatic’s new Tintype lens and two accompanying film cartridges earlier this week, there has been a very positive response throughout the social network system. I myself immediately downloaded the new SnapPak and after just two exposures, felt it was necessary to do an extensive lens/film test, since the results obtained were intriguing.


It was Hipstamatic creative director Aravind taking the lead on how to bring the old traditional look of old daguerreotypes into the digital world of mobile photography. The process proved to be a technical challenge for the team and from my view point, I think they certainly pulled it off with many added benefits as you will see in the following test.


A problem that has been reported by a number of users is it’s ‘sluggishness’ and though it is true, from what I have experiences it is so when using Tinto 1848 lens with either the D or C-Type Plate film, but not so much when using either film with another lens combination. Hipstamatic co-founder Ryan Dorshorst says “The technology and design behind this SnapPak is by far our most complex to-date. Therefore, it takes a bit longer to process these prints than when using our other lenses and films.” 


The greatest surprise came when using C-Type film with other lenses. Many of the test images offered beautiful subtle colors and tones, making C-Type film cartridge one that can be applied mostly across the board for beautiful results. 


On the other hand, D-Type film does not have such a wide variety of changes and this is understandable and should not be considered as a negative. I found several images had beautiful rich tones, making this also a useful film for different types of subject matter.



          The lens/film test

Just taken a few ‘random hand-held’ exposures cannot constitute a lens/film test since it is not undertaken in a controlled environment. Certain conditions have to be met to have results that are consistent This means the primary light illuminating the scene should to be the same from one frame to the next, and the camera and subject matter must be the same from image to image so that the all the results can be compared with each other.


Though SnapPak Tintype was designed for use in portraiture, due to its central focus point and overall shallow depth of field, this lens/film test is based upon a still-life set, as many of you, including myself will be using Tintype for subject other matter then just portraiture.


Gathering numerous items, a still-life is build on the dinning room which is parallel to a large window, exposed to the North for that perfect indirect light favored by portrait photographs like Irving Penn. With the iPhone 4S secured within a DiffCase, that is mounted to a tripod, the set is fine tuned and fill cards and gobos are added to either bounce light into the set or block any light.


My Hipstamatic camera, version 261 is outfitted with 26 different lenses, allowing for a nice variation of results and covering most combinations that might be on your own Hipstamatic camera.


Note: All photographs are straight from the iPhone 4S. There was no manipulation of any kind other than to resize and insert final image into a template that was resized and saved for the web.



          C-Type Plate film test results



Tinto 1848 w C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film



C-Type Plate film




         D-Type Plate film test results



Tinto 1848 w D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film



D-Type Plate film




          Possible lens combinations with Tintype films

I found the following combination based on the C-Type Plate film producing exceptional results with the following lens combinations:

          John S, a rich moody tone
          Jimmy, a soft pale green tinge faded appearance. Excellent to simulate
                a faded photograph
          Melodie, pale colors with a slight green over all tone
          Watts, contrasty, little color intensity but holds detail in the highlights 
          James M, simply beautiful for a retro, aged and color faded photograph
          Americana, with center focus and soft sides
          Jane, giving a true representation of the scene with a faint creme tone
          Roboto Glitter, hot center with faded highlights
          Wonder, holds highlights wonderful while being more contrasty
          Loftus, faded tones with highlights are slightly washed out
          Foxy, giving a true representation of the scene with a faint creme tone


The results with the following lens and C-Type Plate combinations were good and would work for many photographers:

          Lucifier VI, more contrasty, but similar to John S, only warmer, 
               with a touch of rose color
          Tejas, beautiful even gradation and natural soft colors with a hint of rose
          Matty ALN, light green monochrome
          GSquad, contrasty with some detail loss in highlights
          Tinto 1848, contrasty with limited focus area


The list for D-Type Plate film is shorter, only because it lacks the subtle color shifts and overtones found in C-Type Plate film, since the C-Type Plate film was developed to replicate hand-colored prints. Yet the D-Type Plate film does stand on its own very well, even though the number of different lens combinations is less then with C-Type Plate film, it is still a winner.


Preferring to shoot in black and white, I like my prints to have rich darks, pure whites and a full range between the two with no detail loss on either end of the spectrum.


Using the John S lens  with D-Type Plate film does not disappoint, this includes Lucifier VI. For a more even range but still rich blacks, you might want to try Tejas, Watts, Americana or Jane and while Roboto Glitter is similar to Jane, it doe have a warm tone to the overall photograph.


The Wonder and Foxy lens are also very similar in their results and either of the lenses lend themselves very well for all subject matter were retaining detail in either range is important. Between Tinto 1848, GSquad and Lucifier VI, they all share a shorter range and so are more contrasty in their final results.


My favorite D-Type Plate film combinations are especially with Foxy, followed by Tejas, and Americana. For a deeper range I just might go for my old standby John S lens, but also Wonder or if a little more evenness is desires, my other favorite,lens Jane.


Lenses not mentioned should not be dismissed but, in my opinion, have less appeal for serious fine art photography, yet could be applied well for multi-layered collage photographs.



          Final thoughts

There are two criticisms I have with the TinType SnapPak. I feel Hipstamatic missed a good opportunity by not including a camera case designed especially for the Tintype set. A nice wooden camera case with antique brass fittings that are little shop worn, would have added to the beauty of the Tinto 1848 lens, because now I have no a case to do justice for this wonderful package.


My other concern is C-Type film harsh triangle corners. If anything, I wish they were softer and not so distinctive, as I find it very distracting from the over all image. If anything, I wish it were more like multiple water stains, easing into the image from the corners.


In the end, I am very pleased by Tintype SnapPak. It is going to be very hard for me to decide which combination of C-Type and lens to select for a good portion of my photography, especially since my favorite color combination has been Jane lens with a DC (Domenica Catelli) film cartridge and John S lens with Claunch 72 Monochrome film. Now I will be creating a couple new saved favorites.




For my initial response of Hipstamatic release SnapPak Tintype, click here






Post a Comment
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...